similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to marshallk.com

Marshallk alternatives & similar sites

Marshall Kirkpatrick's thoughts – Consultant — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
digital-traffic.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	digital-traffic.net \| Thoughts of a Technology Consultant	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pacs-pros-staffing.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	PACS PROS – Your Unbiased PACS Consultant	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
siriusconsultants.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Sirius Consultants, Inc.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tsmith.co ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Tim's Tech Thoughts	Colombia en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markteisman.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mark Teisman's thoughts and writings	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
savvasbout.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dops.io - Consultancy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simplethoughtsonline.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Simple Thoughts Online	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilebyfarr.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Agile by Farr – thoughts of a software engineer	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sauloaguiar.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Saulo's Thoughts – Ideas, thoughts and learnings about software development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dillongardner.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dillon R. Gardner – Data scientist and consultant	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jacobturner.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	JacobTurner.me – My episodic thoughts	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffcrews.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Random Thoughts of Jeff Crews	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jempire.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	James Steele Empire Blog – my thoughts and stuff	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jadkin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	JAdkin – Thoughts, Ideas and Innovations	United States~ en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamesquest.info ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Quest's Random Thoughts	en	technology-and-computing Tumblr	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markohoven.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	My Brain BLOG – thoughts, ideas and knowledge	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinkonlabs.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Think On Labs – Thoughtfully Solving Problems	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
java-gardener.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Java Gardener — B2B Java Consultancy	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.