similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to markvaneijk.com

Markvaneijk alternatives & similar sites

Mark van Eijk - Laravel Developer from Nijmegen, Netherlands — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Development →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
laravel.software ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Michael Rubél - Senior Laravel Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laraveldevelopers.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Hire Laravel Developers: Api/Cms/Apps Development	en	web-development WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sandiptawhare.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Sandip B. Tawhare \| Full Stack Laravel Developer	en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aariyan.online ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Aariyan Apu — Full Stack Developer from Bangladesh	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abdurrahman.online ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Abdur Rahman jubair \| PHP Laravel & WordPress Developer	en	web-development WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laktab.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Noureddine Laktab \| Full-Stack Web Developer – React & Laravel	Morocco~ en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
felipeflor.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Felipe Flor - WebDeveloper - Vue, Laravel and Typescript	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thewebdeveloper.io ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Web Developer - Sherif Mesallam \| WordPress & Laravel Expert	en	web-development WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abdulqavi.site ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Abdul Qavi \| Senior Laravel & WordPress Developer \| Karachi, Pakistan	en	web-development WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
abongo.co.ke ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mark \|\| Software Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sanilal.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sanilal P Sathyan — Full Stack Developer Dubai \| Laravel, React, AI	United Arab Emirates~ en	web-development WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuelmdeveloper.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Web Developer Samuel M.	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coopercodex.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Derek Cooper \| Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1novak.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1NOVAK - Backend Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
abrar.pro ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Abrar Ahmad - Fullstack web developer and consultant specialized in PHP Laravel	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
2drupalers.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	website developer2	en	web-development WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
backend-developers.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Backend Developers	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cooperfeetham.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Cooper Feetham \| Full Stack Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.