similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to markspirek.com

Markspirek alternatives & similar sites

Mark Spirek | Engineer for Startups, Agencies & Ecommerce — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
7pm.dev ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	7pm.dev \| Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentblog.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Agencies static page	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aetherial.tech ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Aetherial \| Engineering the Sublime	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
websitemotive.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	DTC Ecommerce Sites Directory \| Website Motive	en	technology-and-computing Kirby WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mariocampbellr.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mario Campbell R \| Senior Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webanomaly.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	PressCompare - WordPress Plugins, Themes, Agencies & Developers	en	technology-and-computing WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cyze.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Blake Cyze, Product Engineer in Ottawa	Canada~ en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agarwalankit.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Ankit Agarwal — Senior Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boosteng.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Boost Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jake-alagel.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jacob Alagel \| Full-Stack Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
websitesoncomputers.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Websites On Computers \| Engineering Leadership Consulting	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
websterian.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dynamics + Sitecore = Commerce – Technical content for Dynamics 365 , Sitecore and eCommerce	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3before.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Chris Pollock \| Engineer working at Crezco	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mariosokolovsky.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mario Sokolovsky · Principal Software Engineer · Infra / DevOps Lead	Australia~ en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccharliesins.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Venkateshwar Yadav - Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diegocosta.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Diego Costa - Engineering Manager, Senior Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5tansolution.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	5Tan Solution \| Engineering Scalable Solutions	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
boringengineer.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Boring Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.