similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to markrabey.com

Markrabey alternatives & similar sites

Mark Rabey - Software Engineering Manager — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jeremystover.dev ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Jeremy Stover \| Engineering Leader & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agileengineeringpodcast.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Agile Engineering Podcast - Insights on Agile, DevOps, software engineering, and team leadership from those who live and breathe it	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dionis.me ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Dionis Lebedev. CTO & Head of Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ddub.ca ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Duncan Ward - Engineering Leader	Canada en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
janmatus.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jan Matus — System Architect & Engineering Leadership \| janmatus.com	Poland~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	partial · 8
abhijitjana.net ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Abhijit's Blog – Transforming Engineers to Technology Leaders	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alejandroelinformatico.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Alejandro Dev. - Engineering Lead, Fullstack Developer, Speaker	Spain~ en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonkrause.me ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Jason Patric Kelly Krause	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jasongary.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	The Pragmatic CTO \| Jason Roy Gary \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeremyglassenberg.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Jeremy Glassenberg	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
martyhora.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Martin Hora - Tech Lead & Team Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adamweiss.me ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Simplicity	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
jamescoddington.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	James Coddington - Experience Design	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
matthewseanthomas.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Matthew Sean Thomas \| Passionate Product Leader \| Business, Tech, Design, Human Experience	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wchiang.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	meta.title \| Wesley Chiang	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakebellacera.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Jake Bellacera	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owynrichen.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	OWYN'S MUSINGS	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
derinjoseph.com ↗	50 match 2 shared topics	Derin Joseph - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.