similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to markaaronpolger.com

Markaaronpolger alternatives & similar sites

Mark Aaron Polger, MLIS, PhD – Academic Librarian, Library Marketer, Presenter, Author, and Teacher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
melissasvendsen.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Melissa Svendsen – Reference and Instruction Librarian	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeaninefinn.me ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jeanine Finn – Researcher & librarian	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mccullyediting.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Lily McCully \| McCully editing and academic coaching	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janetfulton.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dr Janet Fulton \| Creativity Researcher and Academic	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahmedafzaal.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ahmed Afzaal – Scholar, Teacher, Writer, Coach	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janehickey.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Jane Hickey \| Academic And Disability Advocate	en	education Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bookmanresearch.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mark Bookman – Disability Historian and Accessibility Consultant	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100mistakes.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	100 Mistakes Academic Writers Make, and How to Fix Them – A podcast for academics and other writers who need to get work done.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100writingmistakes.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	100 Mistakes Academic Writers Make, and How to Fix Them – A podcast for academics and other writers who need to get work done.	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janayebrownwood.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	JANAY BROWN-WOOD, PHD, SPEAKER, AUTHOR, EDUCATOR - Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdlib.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Maryland Library Association	en	education Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diglib.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Digital Library Federation - DLF	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sashazarins.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Sasha Zarins – Academic Researcher	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marufhasanrumi.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Maruf Hasan Rumi - Academic Portfolio	en	education Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
watsearch.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	WatSearch - University of Waterloo Academic Hub	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
markneels.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mark A. Neels – Author, Educator, Historian	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janellejenstad.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Janelle Jenstad – At work and play	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
megan-a-chan.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Megan Chan – Academic Profile of Megan Chan	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.