similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to marinavahter.com

Marinavahter alternatives & similar sites

Marina Vahter — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
academic887375109.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Dr. Vera Lopez	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
luverun.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	luver – LUVER UN	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
sameertendulkar.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Sameer Tendulkar, Ph.D. \| Layers of encapsulation: Facets to the personality of an International Graduate Student in US (Peeling one layer at a time)	en	postgraduate-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
samuelchasesanders.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	A Little About Me	en	postgraduate-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
thiazyl.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Rawson Group \| Windsor, Ontario N8Y3L7	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thvoigt.com ↗	60 match 3 shared topics	Torsten H Voigt	en	postgraduate-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcufoundation.org ↗	42 match 2 shared topics	Marine Corps University Foundation	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mc-alumni.org ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	\| Marie Curie Alumni Association	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mc-aa.org ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	\| Marie Curie Alumni Association	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mc-aa.net ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	\| Marie Curie Alumni Association	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mariecuriealumni.eu ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	\| Marie Curie Alumni Association	European Union en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cccc.edu ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Central Carolina Community College	en	education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
coastalcarolina.edu ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Coastal Carolina Community College	en	college-education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albemarle.edu ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	College of The Albemarle \| North Carolina Community College	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
santiagojmolina.com ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	santiagojmolina – Science, society and technology.	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lander.edu ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Lander University – Greenwood, South Carolina \| Lander University	en	college-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
angelina.edu ↗	41 match 2 shared topics	Angelina College – Invest in yourself. Invest in your future. Be a Roadrunner.	en	college-education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mccfa.org ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Maricopa Community College Faculty Assocation – Tools to succeed in and out of the classroom.	en	college-education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.