similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to margostjames.com

Margostjames alternatives & similar sites

Tribute - Margo St. James — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
gatewaygamejams.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gateway Game Jams \| St. Louis	en	non-profit-organizations Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1st-mile.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	1st-Mile Institute - 1st-Mile Institute	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
housingjusticemaine.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	HOUSING JUSTICE MAINE - Home	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myfreemason.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Freemasons of James M Hays Lodge - Metro Milwaukee Wisconsin	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100womenbeaches.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	100 Women Who Care: Make Your Mark in St. Johns and Duval	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0pensocietyfoundations.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Open Society Foundations	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0pensocietyfoundations.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Open Society Foundations	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
espaisocietatoberta.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Open Society Foundations	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eumap.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Open Society Foundations	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
associationcacs.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	HOME - Association of CACS	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ethicalsource.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Organization for Ethical Source \| Ethical Source: Open Source, Evolved.	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ethics-twi.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Williams Institute for Ethics and Management \| Home \| Ethics-TWI.org	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
commonsenseinstituteus.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Common Sense Institute	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
100womenquinte.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	100+ WOMEN WHO CARE QUINTE - Home	en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
etheridgesonmission.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home - Etheridges on Mission	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
100forpurpose.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	100% for Purpose - Homepage	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
proyectosubete.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Homepage Clean Charity Lite - My Blog	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
europeanflorists.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	The European Florists Consortium	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.