similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to marcus.engineer

Marcus alternatives & similar sites

Marcus Craske — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
friendlyskies.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Friendlyskies.net - Art & Projects by Marc Carson	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdaley.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Marcus Daley \| Metal Console	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
vmg.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Victor Garcia	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
demaskey.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Christoph DeMaskey	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mitchellrust.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mitchell Rust - Developer Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevindcode.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Dang \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
moi.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Moises Aguirre	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
morgantech.info ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Morgantech	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
richercode.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	RicherCode Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
klajdigashiportofolio.online ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Klajdi Gashi - Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mwaterman.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Matt Waterman	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
francescomarchitelli.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Francesco Marchitelli	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdyduch.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Marcin Dyduch	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dnorth.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	David North \| The personal blog of David North, software engineer, manager, walker, reader and occasional ranter.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kernelpaniq.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	CodeAsm \| CodeAsm’s domain	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
khoivan.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Khoi Van \| Khoi Van - Android Developer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kielbasa.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dawid Kielbasa	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
julian.so ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Julian Christian Anderson	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.