similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to m108.info

M108 alternatives & similar sites

M108 — Eva & Adrián — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Space And Astronomy →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ailien.fun ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	AILIEN — Exploring the Pumpfun Universe	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1b.fund ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Astromin — Telescopes & Astrophotography Equipment	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adastranova.biz ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	BEYOND — AdAstraNova.biz	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voidindex.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Void Index — Vol. 1 Archive	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voidstar.blog ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	voidstar adventures — xiphod	en	space-and-astronomy WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kerbalnet.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Melody Space Center — Exploring the Kerbol System	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reveriedemo.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Reverie — Universe Demo	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adampaul.space ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Adam Paul — adampaul.space	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
judezerog.vip ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	SpaceX First Mascot — $JUDE	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
skytrace.app ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	SkyTrace — Know what's overhead	en	space-and-astronomy	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frmap.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Line Circle — Celestial Time	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
1000beats.red ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	1000beats.red — Mars Decimal Time	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliens.guru ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	AliensGuru — The Alien Encyclopedia	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliens.et ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	THEY WALK AMONG US — DECLASSIFIED	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
benjaminidini.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Benjamin Idini — Planetary Scientist	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reportingrise.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Field dispatches — Reporting RISE	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
3iatlas.life ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	ATLAS Flyby — Aliens or Stupid Rock?	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aliens.horse ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	AliensHorse — Alien Prediction Markets	en	space-and-astronomy	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.