similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Toplists Browse free →

Sites similar to luke.fi

Luke alternatives & similar sites

Luonnonvarakeskus | Luonnonvarakeskus — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
su.se ↗	100 match 14 shared linkers	Stockholms universitet - Stockholms universitet	Sweden sv	college-education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wwf.fi ↗	55 match shared topic	WWF Suomi	Finland fi	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tuwien.at ↗	98 match 13 shared linkers	Technische Universität Wien \| TU Wien	Austria de	college-education TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sll.fi ↗	55 match shared topic	Suomen luonnonsuojeluliitto	Finland fi	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
helsinki.fi ↗	85 match 15 shared linkers	University of Helsinki	Finland fi	college-education Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ymparistotarra.com ↗	55 match shared topic	Euroopan ympäristötarrat \| Ilmainen toimitus	Czechia~ fi	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
yle.fi ↗	48 match 10 shared linkers	Yle.fi \| Uutiset, urheilu, ilmiöt	Finland fi	sports	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 16
vesi.fi ↗	55 match shared topic	Vesiaiheisen tutkitun tiedon lähde	Finland fi	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
metsakeskus.fi ↗	55 match shared topic	Suomen metsäkeskus	Finland fi	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kuusamo.fi ↗	55 match shared topic	Kuusamo	Finland fi	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
virrat.fi ↗	55 match shared topic	Etusivu \| Virtain kaupunki	Finland fi	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gtk.fi ↗	28 match shared topic	Geologian tutkimuskeskus GTK - Ratkaisuja vauhdittamaan siirtymää kestävään, hiilineutraaliin maailmaan \| —	Finland fi	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lahti.fi ↗	28 match shared topic	Lahti	Finland fi	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pori.fi ↗	28 match shared topic	Porin kaupunki	Finland fi	civic-affairs WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mhy.fi ↗	28 match shared topic	Etusivu - Metsänhoitoyhdistys	Finland fi	land-and-farms WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pjhoy.fi ↗	28 match shared topic	Renyy \| Uusi nimi, vanha tuttu Pirkanmaan Jätehuolto	Finland fi	environmental-services-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pefc.fi ↗	28 match shared topic	PEFC Suomi	Finland fi	environmental-services-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaakonkulma.fi ↗	18 match shared topic	Etusivu \| Kaakonkulma	Finland fi	environment BigCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 18

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.