similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to liquidfabrics.com

Liquidfabrics alternatives & similar sites

liquidfabrics – print // brand // art – true products — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
savvidis.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	buero ®S — designing experiences for brands, products and people	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schlereth-design.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Schlereth Design – Printmedien	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dabi.me ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Robert Dabi – Designer for Object, Brand, Print	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deersign.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	DEERSIGN – Produktdesign aus Berlin	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roland-schoen.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Roland Schön – Grafik // Webdesign // Produktion	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
s-wert-design.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	s.wert Designshop - architecture inspired art + products since 2002 – s-wert	Germany de	design Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
s-wert.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	s.wert Designshop - architecture inspired art + products since 2002 – s-wert	Germany de	design Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
klingerbordihn.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	KLINGERBORDIHN DESIGN – product & furniture design – Alexander Klinger & Peter Bordihn	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
henningluedeke.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Henning Luedeke / Design Director / Digital Product Design + Brand Systems	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4-dimensional.space ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	4dimensional – Printdesign & Gestaltung Schweiz	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kevinzeller.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Zeller – Freelance Senior Product Designer	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vju-digital.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Vju – Digitale Produkte & Marken aus einer Hand	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vju-studio.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Vju – Digitale Produkte & Marken aus einer Hand	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
carinacavegn.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CC Production Design	de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nomenproducts.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Nomenproducts	de	design SilverStripe	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
adlips.design ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Designagentur Dortmund – Brand Identity & Creative Direction – A.DB	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kirstendesigner.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	CAUSA Design – Produkte nachhaltig zu perfektionieren	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kluge-art.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	kluge-art – Anne Kluge	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.