similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to libmpq.org

Libmpq alternatives & similar sites

Maik Broemme - Homepage — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
crimsonkaim.de ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	Crimson's Home Directory	Germany de	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
antihack.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Codetactics.de - Get your Code! - 'Thoughts and codepieces on MODx, Zend Framework, TDD and loads of other stuff	Germany de	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
athq.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Yannik Schmidt Freelance	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atlantishq.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Yannik Schmidt Freelance	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
astronautica.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Data Science, Python, Blender, JavaScript - Michael Müller	Germany de	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cstenkamp.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Hey ✌️ I'm Chris	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
creative-doing.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Adam Lukaszewski - Senior developer and expert (freelancer)	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
christiantietze.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Welcome! • Christian Tietze	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7ig.net ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	NetMF-Tutorial.de – Ein Einstieg in das .Net Micro Framework für C#-Entwickler	de	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alewelt.info ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Kay Alewelt	de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amitsen.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Amit Sen - iOS & Android Developer, Tech Writer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreasgiemza.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Übersicht [Andreas' Wiki]	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
androidx.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	1br.de – Kurze Tutorials, große Wirkung	Germany de	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrej-maric.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Andrej Maric - Full-Stack Developer	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anoymous.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	anoy. \| anoymouserver	Germany de	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anton-rausch.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Alex's Tech Blog — it stuff	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arausch.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Alex's Tech Blog — it stuff	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
arduino-craft-corner.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Arduino Craft Corner – Getting things done with an Arduino	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.