similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to learningtoforgive.com

Learningtoforgive alternatives & similar sites

Forgive for good - @ LearningToForgive.com — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Mental Health →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
centerforlivingandlearning.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Center for Living and Learning	en	mental-health WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamnotbreaking.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Forgive Me Ron	en	mental-health Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learninghowtohelp.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learning how to help	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningwithdrliv.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learning with Dr. Liv	en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
healthymindslearning.ca ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Healthy Minds Learning	Canada en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
equilore.co.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Equilore \| Equine Therapy and Learning	United Kingdom en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningfromfear.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learning From Fear - Home	en	mental-health Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningtothrivellc.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learning to Thr;ve – MFT	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
flintshirewellbeing.org.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Flintshire Wellbeing – Flintshire Learning for Recovery & Wellbeing	United Kingdom en	mental-health WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learninner.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	learninner \| Home	en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deehobbit.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dee’s Meanderings \| Conversations for good.	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningact.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learning ACT – A website for therapists learning Acceptance and Committment Therapy	en	mental-health WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
membercareassociates.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Member Care Associates – A Global Portal for Good Practice	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cupsychiatryedu.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CU Psych Learning – Learning Management System	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cupsychlearning.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CU Psych Learning – Learning Management System	en	mental-health WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
debbiewatermanphd.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Move Forward - Home	United States~ en	mental-health Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
centeredscholar.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mindfulness Based Learning - The Centered Scholar	en	mental-health WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
encompassdorset.co.uk ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Home and Respite Care \| Learning Disabilities Charity	United Kingdom en	mental-health	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.