similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to learninglad.com

Learninglad alternatives & similar sites

Free Programming Tutorials | LearningLad — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
leelogs.com ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	LeeLogs - Programming Tutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programmingabc.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Programming Tutorials for Beginners	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
btutor.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Bill's Programming Tutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cscprogrammingtutorials.com ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Computer Science Programming Tutorials \| Free Programming Tutorials, eBooks, Source Codes	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mycplus.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	MYCPLUS — Programming Tutorials, Code Examples & CS Guides	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hyprogramming.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Hy Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leelasoft.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	C Programming & Data Structures Tutorials - CCompilter	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prodevelopertutorial.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	ProDeveloperTutorial.com - Tutorials and Programming Solutions	en	programming-languages WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
flixprogramming.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Flix Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
processingprogramming.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Processing Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cs-fundamentals.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	IT Interview Questions and Answers & Programming Tutorials - cs-Fundamentals.com	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programmingexample.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Home - Programming Example	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
professionalsurveyservices.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Markplex home \| TradeStation EasyLanguage Tutorials & Programming	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
professorfontanez.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Programming Corner	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programming4u.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Programming4u - Learn Programming & Data Structures	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learninjava.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Learning Java \| Free Java Tutorials from Experts \| Java Tips & Tricks	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
programmingdd.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Programming DD	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csinfo360.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Programming Practice	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.