similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to learn-c.net

Learn C alternatives & similar sites

Learn C — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
bcoburn.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Today I Learned	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kotlinkit.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	KotlinKit - Learn Kotlin	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bbminfo.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	bbminfo tutorials - Learn from scratch	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agilearn.co.uk ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Agilearn — Self-directed Python guides	United Kingdom en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
moreplease.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learn Tech by Example - More { } Please	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alchemistcamp.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Learn Elixir and Phoenix \| Alchemist Camp	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
langfor.dev ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Learn programming languages by comparison \| langfor.dev	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polyrepl.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	PolyRepl - Learn a programming language by typing real code	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
krivalar.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Krivalar - Learn Computer Fundamentals, OS, C, Java Programming, Data Structures...	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
algtrax.app ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Algtrax - Learn, Code, and Visualize Algorithms	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
devtutorials.net ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	DevTutorials - Learn Programming with Hands-on Tutorials \| DevTutorials	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pointless.dev ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Pointless: A Programming Language for Learning	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cstml.dev ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	~/cstml.dev \| A blog like a sketchbook to keep track of my ideas, findings, and learnings. Suggestions via PRs @github or DM me on twitter.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
concreteinstaller.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	My Coding Path Blog - A resource hub for individuals learning to code, offering tutorials, resources, and guides for various programming languages	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
otfried.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Otfried Cheong	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
otpisani.net ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Repositories \| nikeke	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
overlyenthusiastic.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Overly Enthusiastic	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owen-lang.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Owen programming language	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.