similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to leafyowl.com

Leafyowl alternatives & similar sites

Diane(Ziyi) Jian — Interaction & Visual Designer – Designing rhythm, emotion, and interface. — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
siamak-art.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Textile and carpet designer – Siamak Egharloo (Eagle)	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
artsigncomunicacao.com.br ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Art Sign – Comunicação Visual	Brazil en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
brookechao.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Welcome to J. Brooke Chao Designs	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amulyadav.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Amul Yadav \| Brand Identity, Motion & Visual Designer - Amul Yadav - Graphic Designer	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaydensanden.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Graphic Design, Branding and Interactive Design	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
channingritter.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Channing Ritter – Product & visual design direction	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designrescue.co.uk ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Design Rescue \| Urgent Presentation & Visual Design Help	United Kingdom en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
amandawallgren.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Amanda Wallgren – Interaction Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-zdravkovic.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Aleksandar Zdravkovic — Interactive Motion Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
justynaklos.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	JK / UI Visual Designer / Design Systems	en	design Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actdesign.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ActDesign.Org – Design for graphic, digital, and interactive projects.	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brookequalman.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Brooke Qualman – Freelance NYC Brand Designer & Design Director	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
admdesigning.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	ADM Designing – Graphic Designer and Author	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
amritakhoshoo.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Amrita Khoshoo – Interaction Designer	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ianflemingdesign.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Ian Fleming Design \| Branding, Motion & Visual Systems	Ireland~ en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leannehoworth.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Leanne Howorth — Interactive Media Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdesigning.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	MC Designing - Founder - Lead Designer \| Contra	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamfes.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Fes Naqvi - Interaction & Design Systems - Fes Naqvi - Interaction & Design Systems	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.