Piperic
similar sites
‹ ProfilePricingAI ReportBrowse free →

Sites similar to leadersgate.com

Leadersgate alternatives & similar sites

CORNFELD Executive Search – Executive Search — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Executive Leadership And Management →

DomainMatchTitleCountry/LangCategoryAI filesContactAI-protection
247-heads.com 71 match
1 shared topics
247 heads – Executive Search by Christine Frank de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
247heads.com 71 match
1 shared topics
247 heads – Executive Search by Christine Frank de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
mittelstand-personal.com 70 match
1 shared topics
Executive Search Frankfurt Main | manager search de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
dmr-int.com 68 match
1 shared topics
DMR International — Executive Search & Advisory de executive-leadership-and-managementSpree Commerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone partial · 8
thbender.com 68 match
1 shared topics
Executive Search USA & Nordamerika | TH Bender de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
friedrich-consulting.com 67 match
1 shared topics
Friedrich Consulting OHG — Executive Search im Automobilhandel Germany~ de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
nahrgang-coaching.com 67 match
1 shared topics
Executive-Coaching in Berlin - Nahrgang Executive Coaching de executive-leadership-and-managementJimdo robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
elverfeldt-coaching.com 67 match
1 shared topics
Business Coaching – Executive Coach in Frankfurt de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
deltacon-exs.com 67 match
1 shared topics
Personalberatung für Executive Search in Deutschland Österreich Schweiz de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
deltacon-personalberatung.com 67 match
1 shared topics
Personalberatung für Executive Search in Deutschland Österreich Schweiz de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
management-coaching.biz 65 match
1 shared topics
Executive Management Coaching de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
nadinehebbel.com 65 match
1 shared topics
Nadine Hebbel | Executive Neuro-Coaching de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
alexandra-geusau.at 65 match
1 shared topics
Dr. Alexandra Geusau - Executive Coach - Home Austria de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
steffenelbert.com 64 match
1 shared topics
Dr. Steffen Elbert | Executive Leadership Development de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
ffmcoaching.com 64 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching Frankurt - FFM COACHING Germany~ de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPress robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
nadjahenrich.com 64 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching und Personaldiagnostik | Nadja Henrich de executive-leadership-and-managementWordPressWooCommerce robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
marcaurel.coach 64 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching | Schweiz | Zürich | Marc Aurel Hunziker de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none
marcaurel.swiss 64 match
1 shared topics
Executive Coaching | Schweiz | Zürich | Marc Aurel Hunziker de executive-leadership-and-management robotsllmsaihumans emailphone none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.