similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to lcrossley.com

Lcrossley alternatives & similar sites

Laura Crossley – History PhD candidate at George Mason University — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
leahmholle0.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Leah M. Holle – PhD candidate \| social worker \| researcher \| advocate	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sparkingcollaborationwithotterbein.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Otterbein University - INTRODUCTION	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
spencerjchang.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Spencer J. Chang - Spencer J. Chang	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thegeekwave.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Geekwave - University of Utah	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningcorpsdsu.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	The Learning Corps Situation at Dickinson State University	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdxmindsblog.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Middlesex University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
melcer.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Melcer	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
maevekane.net ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Maeve Kane – Department of History \| University at Albany	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heatherhologram.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Heather Menefee	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abolition.university ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Abolition University - studying within/against/beyond the university	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cm-unity.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CMUnity · Carnegie Mellon University	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
aglossaryofrhetoric.blog ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	A Glossary of Rhetoric – A University of Texas at Austin student's Glossary of Rhetoric	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csualum.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alumni Association \| Colorado State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csualum.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alumni Association \| Colorado State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctumsu.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CTUMSU - The website of the Clerical-Technical Union of Michigan State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ctumsu.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CTUMSU - The website of the Clerical-Technical Union of Michigan State University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
meghanoneil.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Meghan M. O’Neil, PhD – Michigan State University	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rosatapia.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Rosa Tapia – Lawrence University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.