similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to lclhost.org

Lclhost alternatives & similar sites

localhost research — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
conradresearch.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Conrad Research	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alfathchronicles.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Al Fath Research	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johnx.co ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	johnx — Research Notes	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hessamemami.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Hessam's Research & Papers	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pacificresearchplatform.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	National Research Platform (NRP)	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diablomountainresearch.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Diablo Mountain Research	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
popsiclelabs.io ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Popsicle Labs \| User Experience Research + Behavioral Science	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
comparite.ch ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Comparitech - Tech researched, compared and rated	Switzerland en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcglo.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Neil McGlohon - Research Scientist	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cryptopaper.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	CryptoPaper.io - Post-Quantum Cryptography Research Hub	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hesamameri.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Hesam Ameri - Indie Hacker, Researcher & Builder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcdan909.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Dan McCarthy \| UX Researcher Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estevez-moya.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Estevez-Moya — PhD Researcher & Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
laoutaris.info ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Personal homepage – Researcher & Innovator	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
moonshakerlabs.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Moon Shaker Labs – Independent Research & Product Lab	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shreejitverma.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Shreejit Verma \| Quantitative Developer & Researcher	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agh2o.co.uk ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	DreamWeaver Electronic Alchemy Research Project	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larrywigington.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Larry Wigington \| Operations Research Scientist & USMC Lieutenant Colonel	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.