similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to layer22.com

Layer22 alternatives & similar sites

layer|twenty|two · Piotr Usewicz—Web Application Developer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aashishbhusal.tech ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Aashish Bhusal \| Backend Developer \| Web Applications	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
florianphp.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Florian - Software Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nanojs.org ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	nano JavaScript framework // Rapidly deploy UI for web applications	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
travisliu.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Travis Liu – Software Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
silgy.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Node++ is an asynchronous HTTP(S) engine and framework for low-latency C/C++ web applications	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
learningwebappdev.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Build a web app with JavaScript and Node.js. Learning Web Application Development -- eBook now Available from O'Reilly Media.	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jzehner.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jakub Zehner — Fullstack .NET/React Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
mkipp.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Matthew Kipp \| Software Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielgranger.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Daniel Granger \| .NET Web Developer	United Kingdom en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kandhal.tech ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kandhal Shakil \| Python Developer & Full Stack Engineer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iamsrujal.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Srujal Patel - Full Stack Web Developer	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
princevrse.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Prince Kumar — Full-Stack Developer \| Princevrse	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bezkoder.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	BezKoder - Mobile & Web App Development Tutorials	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mehdirh.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Mehdi \| Python Developer	en	programming-languages Saleor	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaisbettaieb.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kais BETTAIEB — Python Developer @ Display Interactive	France~ en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kbt.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kais BETTAIEB — Python Developer @ Display Interactive	France~ en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
edtervit.co.uk ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Ed Tervit - Web Developer	United Kingdom en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a8k.dev ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Saif Abdelrazek \| Full Stack Developer & Student	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.