similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to landercan.org

Landercan alternatives & similar sites

LCAN Homepage - Lander Climate Action Network — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Environment →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
1stfruitssierraleone.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Empowering Youth for Climate Change & Gender Justice	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
concordgreenspace.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Smart Growth, Equitable Development & Local Climate Action \| Concord Greenspace (CG3)\| Concord NH	en	environment Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
allianceforclimateimpact.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Home - allianceforclimateimpact.org	en	environment WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashden.org ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Ashden • Climate Change Charity	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
panap.net ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Pesticide Action Network Asia Pacific – Advancing food sovereignty, environmental health, and social justice since 1992.	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
p-a-foundation.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	I.M.PEI Foundation \| concrete action for global benefit	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
panda-foundation.org ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	I.M.PEI Foundation \| concrete action for global benefit	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
positive-work.com ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Positive work for the environment and for social justice. Organizations supporting solving our global warming, climate change and social injustice issues.	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
volohealth.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - VoLo Foundation	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
outdoorvoice.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - TOGETHER Bay Area	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aloka-foundation.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - Aloka Foundation	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hgnetwork.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Herefordshire Green Network - Local Ecological & Environmental Groups	en	environment WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
menagreenmovement.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	MENA Green Movement Network	en	environment Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albatrosscoalition.org ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - Save The Albatross Coalition	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
compostbaladi.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Home - Compost Baladi	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1odysea.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	1ODYSEA \| Home	en	environment	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oxfordclimatepolicy.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	oxfordclimatepolicy.org \|	en	environment Drupal	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
land-legacy.org ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Land Legacy – Common Sense Conservation	en	environment WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.