similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to lancer-project.org

Lancer Project alternatives & similar sites

LANCER - Learning network cyber agents — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
buzzery.ch ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	DQ0 - Privacy-Preserving Machine Learning	Switzerland en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
morebooks.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	QUE.com - Artificial Intelligence Machine Learning CyberSecurity Robotics Blockchain	en	artificial-intelligence WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conatix.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Conatix – AI-Powered Network Log Analytics	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bayousense.com ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Bayou Sense \| Cybersecurity & Agentic AI Consulting \| New Orleans	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ethosagentics.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Ethos Agentics	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
owlshield.ai ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	OwlShield - Secure Your AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
landofagents.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Land of Agents — Least privilege for AI agents	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kratosphereai.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Agentic AI Cybersecurity Platform \| KratosphereAI	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0eroshot.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	ZeroShot — Offensive Security Testing for AI Agents	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0rce.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	0rce — Adversarial Cyber Resilience	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0auth.ai ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	AI Agent Authentication & Permissioning	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
p-matrix.io ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	P-MATRIX — See how your AI agents behave	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
complicer.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Complicer - Compliance Automation Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heyekai.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Ekai CoWork — Secure AI Co-Workers for Cybersecurity Teams	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ponte.ai ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Ponte AI — AI Agent Governance Platform	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
42crunch.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Automate API Security across Agentic Workflows	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heyclarm.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Clarm - Governed AI agents for regulated teams	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybertrap.ch ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	AI-Driven Active Cyber Defense \| Outsmart Attackers with CyberTrap	Switzerland en	information-and-network-security HubSpot	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.