similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to kylewillmott.com

Kylewillmott alternatives & similar sites

Kyle Willmott – Sociologist — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Education →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
janeluisefurey.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Jane L. Furey – Sociologist and Demographer	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thinksociology.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Think Sociology	en	education Squarespace	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janierola.net ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jani Erola – Social sciences and all that…	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jessemaxsmith.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jesse M. Smith, PhD – Professor of Sociology	en	education WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aleksandra-bartoszko.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Aleksandra Bartoszko – Social anthropologist & professor of social work	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
associationofblacksociologists.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Home - The Association of Black Sociologists	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
affective-sociology.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Cognitive and Affective Sociology - Home	en	education Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jakewomick.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Jake Womick – Psychological Research by Dr. Jake Womick	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
4sociology.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	4Sociology -- Search Engine for Sociology Research, News, and Resources	en	education	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cssponline.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Colorado Society of School Psychologists	en	education Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
matthewdemaio.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Matthew DeMaio – Anthropologist	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mariobaldassari.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mario J. Baldassari, Ph.D. – Applied Cognitive Psychologist	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mattwabel.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Matt Abel – Anthropologist, Teacher, Researcher	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jaredpurcell.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jared Michael Purcell – Personal Portfolio /ˈdʒæɹɜd peɹˈsɜɫ/ Philologist-Linguist	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jeremymenchik.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Jeremy Menchik – Associate Professor of International Relations and Political Science at Boston University	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dialogueswfe.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Decolonising Social Work Practicum	en	education Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mastersociology.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Master Sociology - Concise , Effective and Efficient	en	education WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonfrankelpratt.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Simon Frankel Pratt – Lecturer of Political Science – University of Melbourne	en	education WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.