similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot Observatory🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to kr-co.de

Kr Co alternatives & similar sites

Krueger Consulting – Protection. Performance. Success — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cycure.io ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	cycure – IT-Sicherheit, Webentwicklung & KI-Lösungen für Ihr Unternehmen	Germany~ de	information-and-network-security WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
scrax.de ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Scrax — Penetration Tester & Developer	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
schmoppo.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	schmop: Ich und meine Projekte - schmoppo.de	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
roman-schwartz.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Home \| Seite	Germany de	web-development Grav	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sabrinamolsen.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Hannes Molsen. Software Security.	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
secureinitiative.de ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	The Secure Initiative \| secureinitiative.com	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
vulport.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	Ihr Experte für IT-Security im Webumfeld - Vulport Web & Security	de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
captchacat.com ↗	60 match 2 shared topics	ByeBot \| Ein neuer Maßstab für Privacy-CAPTCHAs	Germany~ de	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simonbassermann.de ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Simon Bassermann — Security Advisor & Webdesigner	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ammann.pro ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	ammann.pro — Software, die Unternehmen sicher wachsen lässt	de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kiconsult.de ↗	40 match 2 shared topics	Beratung - ki GmbH	Germany de	web-development WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kvc-germany.de ↗	37 match 1 shared topics	Kai Viehmeier Consulting	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cybersicherheit.jetzt ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Start - Dettweiler Consulting	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0day.consulting ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	API Consulting	de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
egger-it.com ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	EGGER-IT - Consulting & Solutions	de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ruckus-wireless.de ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	Barrington Consulting GmbH	Germany de	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sebastianroming.de ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	sebastianroming • Development & Consulting	Germany de	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
klagge-it.de ↗	36 match 1 shared topics	KSec-Consulting – IT-Security Consulting, Testing & Research	Germany de	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.