similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to kommomend.de

Kommomend alternatives & similar sites

waddisch.de – Die Sprache von Essen-Werden — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Language Learning →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
komm-omend.de ↗	85 match 1 shared topics	waddisch.de – Die Sprache von Essen-Werden	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
knowenglish.de ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	knowenglish.de – Sprachcoaching	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
einfache-sprache.info ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Einfache Sprache	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leichtzulesen.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Leichte und Einfache Sprache	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romanisch.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mit Spass die Rätoromanische Sprache lernen - Romanisch	de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
konjugation.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Treffpunkt Konjugation - Das Forum für die deutsche Sprache	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
romanische-sprachen.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Herzlich willkommen! \| Romanische Sprachen	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5d-dalmacija.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hrvatska za Nijemce – Kroatisch Sprachkurs	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
babyzeichensprache.info ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Anmelden ‹ Campus Zwergensprache – WordPress	United States~ de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
speak-dating.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Speak-Dating – SprachCafé Polnisch	de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alooha.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Alooha — Sprache lernen, die Welt kennenlernen	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kirgisisch.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CIN - Leistungen zum Thema Zentralasiatische Sprachen	Germany de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rotoclamp.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Bitte wählen Sie Ihre Sprache	de	language-learning	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sphinx-lingua.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Sphinx Lingua - Sprache erleben	de	language-learning Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kongbu.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kongbu.de – Koreanisch Lernen	Germany de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thomaskoehling.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Thomas Köhling – Sprachproben	de	language-learning WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rose-college.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	ROSE College – Sprachtraining für Unternehmen	de	language-learning Webflow	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
klingonisch.de ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home – Deutsches Klingonisch-Institut	Germany de	language-learning WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.