similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to kirilldesigns.com

Kirilldesigns alternatives & similar sites

Creative Director | Brand Strategy, Design & Marketing — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ashamody.com ↗	78 match 2 shared topics	Asha Mody \| Creative Director \| Brand Strategist	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ashafable.com ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Ash Afable \| Brand Identity, Design & Creative Strategy	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
rav3n.tech ↗	75 match 2 shared topics	Rav3n — Brand Designer, Creative Director & Web3 Marketing Lead	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karimothman.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	Karim Othman \| Creative Director & Brand Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenshew.com ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	Ken Shew — Brand Designer & Creative Director	en	design	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denim-creative.co.uk ↗	74 match 2 shared topics	Denim Creative: Kent, UK. Brand, Design and Marketing	United Kingdom en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kayisokay.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Kay Tran - Design and Creative Director	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designproject.co.uk ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Design & Branding Agency Leeds, Strategy, Digital, Packaging	United Kingdom en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
elbadr.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Design & Branding Agency Leeds, Strategy, Digital, Packaging	United Kingdom~ en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
chealevilla.com ↗	73 match 2 shared topics	Home - Cheale Villa \| Brand Strategist, Creative Director, Graphic Designer	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kate-hurst.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Kate Hurst \| Brand Strategy, Experience Design & Creative Direction End-to-end brand strategy, experience design and event consultancy	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
digition.co.uk ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Brand Design & Brand Strategy Studio \| Digition	United Kingdom en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katherinemacdonnell.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Katherine MacDonnell \| Creative Director & Brand Strategist	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
midhatroohi.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	MIDHAT \| Brand Identity & Creative Direction	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mike-belt.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	MIKEBELT – Creative Direction & Design	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tshute.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Taylor Shute — Creative Director	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katesessentials.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	KATES ESSENTIALS \| Branding, Creative Direction & Digital Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mikeshaefer.com ↗	72 match 2 shared topics	Mike Shaefer \| CPG Creative Director & Designer	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.