similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to kiilma.com

Kiilma alternatives & similar sites

Kiilma Art - — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Fine Art →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
rickfall.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Startsida - Art	sv	fine-art WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myrinlifeandart.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Myrin Life & Art	sv	fine-art	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
terranovaartdesign.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	NOVA ART & DESIGN \| Handmade paintings, jewelry, resinart and much more	sv	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
marielevin.shop ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Marie Levin ArtPrint – Marie Levin Shop	sv	fine-art Shopify	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abstraktkonst.nu ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Abstrakt konst - Abstrakt konst av Susanne Grahn	sv	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wildtotemshop.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	wildtotemshop	sv	fine-art	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
miryamahlstrom.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	miryamahlstrom	sv	fine-art	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bukowskis.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Auktion Bukowskis - Bukowskis	sv	fine-art	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ellenlindgren.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Studio	sv	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akebergqvist.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Åke Bergqvist. Konstnär Växjö, Kronoberg, 35263 Växjö, \| START	sv	fine-art	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
frykholm.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Lars-Åke Frykholm – Hemsida	sv	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a-gravyr.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	A-Gravyr \| Skyltar i Göteborg \| A-Gravyr ALLT i SKYLTAR	sv	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gianluigigiudici.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Gianlui Giudici - hyllningssida till en fantastisk konstnär	sv	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nadatendzeric.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	NADA TENDZERIC, konstnär	sv	fine-art	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zoetterman.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Art by Pierre Zoetterman	sv	fine-art	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
bekitart.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Bekitart – Mapping the Inner Prisma	sv	fine-art WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
winnberg.net ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Gabriel Winnberg \| Artist & Philosopher	sv	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
winnberg.org ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Gabriel Winnberg \| Artist & Philosopher	sv	fine-art WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.