similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to kevindyer.org

Kevindyer alternatives & similar sites

Kevin P. Dyer — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
kevinpatel.xyz ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Kevin Patel	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinlaw.info ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Law	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinkirsche.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Kirsche	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinpechersky.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Pechersky	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zuronix.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Zuronix \| Digital Solutions	United States~ en	information-and-network-security Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
cdyn.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hello, I'm Cendyne	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cendyne.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Hello, I'm Cendyne	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbeybia.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Baha DBEYBIA - dbeybia.com	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
alonzow.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Alonzo \| Full Stack Engineer & Cybersecurity	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
legiatechnology.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Legia Technology - Secure. Build. Scale. \| Cybersecurity & Software Development	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jwalkerjohnson.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	James Johnson \| Cybersecurity & Platform Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denyspopov.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Denys Popov — Cryptography Engineer & Author	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deployeddefenses.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Deployed Defenses - Expert Network Security Solutions	en	information-and-network-security Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dennis-mo.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Dennis Mo	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sinfosecurity.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Supreme Information Security LLC \| Cybersecurity & Development Solutions	United States~ en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keymint.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Software Licensing API & Infrastructure \| Keymint	en	information-and-network-security	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
briankutner.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Brian Kutner \| IT Engineer - IAM & Infrastructure	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
kairavip-portfolio.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Kairavi Parmar — Portfolio	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.