similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to keswani.dev

Keswani alternatives & similar sites

Samir Keswani — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
keswani.ai ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Akriti Keswani - Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mochamadgia.cloud ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Mochamad Gia Priyana P \| Mochamad Gia Priyana P - Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
medina.nyc ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gustavo Medina \| Technology Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aadhi.xyz ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Aadhithya Arun \| SWE and Student	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahangari.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Amir Ahangari — engineer, founder, salsero	Canada~ en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
franciscogonzalez.tech ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Francisco González - Full-Stack Software Engineer	CR~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
girachawda.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Gira Chawda \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nathanyearout.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Nathan Yearout — Full-Stack Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simakis.me ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Panagiotis Simakis	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenzhiyilin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ken \| Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mjsy.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Mohammed Aljer • Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gilbertramirez.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	home \| gilbert ramirez	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gillysuit.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	home \| gilbert ramirez	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
akshatkhandelwal.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Akshat Khandelwal \| SRE Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benkrack.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Ben Krack \| Testing Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theodores.dev ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Theodore's Thing	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adyuta.online ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Adyuta Indra Adyatma — Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3enix.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	3Enix	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.