similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to kcnhub.com

Kcnhub alternatives & similar sites

KCNHUB — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Science →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
khonkaenscience.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	ศูนย์วิทยาศาสตร์เพื่อการศึกษาขอนแก่น	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
theemergingscience.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	The Emerging Science \| The Emerging Science	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mintsharepicgenerator.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MINT Zukunft e.V. free sharepic-generator	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thebiggestsundial.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	THE BIGGEST SUNDIAL	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sslaboratoryfurniture.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	SSLS - Lab	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
netfuture.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	NetFuture: Science, Technology, and Human Responsibility	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gantgeo.org ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Gant Geo - Gant Geo	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kevinferri.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Kevin Ferri	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kennylam8.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Kenny Lam	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
math3ma.institute ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	The Math3ma Institute - Esteeming the Voice of Christ in the Sciences	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advancednanoparticles.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Buy carbon quantum dots - Advanced Nanoparticles	en	science Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zyntholab.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	ZynthoLab — Science Made Possible	en	science Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
neurowomen.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Home \| Women in Neuroscience	en	science WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexhwilliams.info ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Alex Williams	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
associationofsciencecommunicators.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Association of Science Communicators • Giving science a voice.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
affectnet.org ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	AffectNet \| The first comprehensive citation network map of the affective science literature.	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3drosetta.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Rosetta Universe® Media Centre: Videos, Articles, & Images	en	science	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gilliankingcargile.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	Gillian King-Cargile – Writer. Podcaster. Professional Science Appreciator.	en	science WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.