similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to kcdf.org

Kcdf alternatives & similar sites

Community Development Fund — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Non Profit Organizations →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ccdf-gulfcounty.org ↗	80 match 1 shared topics	Christian Community Development Fund	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdsociety.org ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	Community Development Society	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdsbd.org ↗	79 match 1 shared topics	Community Development Society	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdisindh.org ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	Community Development Intiatives	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdartdistrict.com ↗	78 match 1 shared topics	Affinity Community Development	en	non-profit-organizations Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccdindia.org ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Centre For Community Development	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
kandacdi.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Kanda Community Development Initiative	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cfcodliberia.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	CHARITABLE FUND FOR COMMUNITY DEVELOPMENT	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdalpo.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Community Development Association (CDA)	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdfnigeria.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Community Development Foundation - Homepage	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kappacommunity.org ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Kappa Community Development Foundation, Inc.	en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kadeshcdc.org ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Kadesh Community Development Washington, DC	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cdextlibrary.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Home - Community Development Extension Library	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ic4cd.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Innovation center for community development	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d2icdc.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Dare to Imagine Community Development Corporation	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
mcld.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	The Movement for Community-led Development	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aalcdi.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Alpha Alpha Lambda Community Development, Inc.	United States~ en	non-profit-organizations	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mdsngo.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Minority Development Society	en	non-profit-organizations WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.