similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to kb-coordination.com

Kb Coordination alternatives & similar sites

KB - Coordination — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Government Support And Welfare →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
qualitysupportcoordination.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Quality Support Coordination - Home	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccany.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Home - Coordinated Care Alliance New York	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mindfulccc.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Mindful Care Coordination and Consulting	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
qualitypathways.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Quality Pathways – NDIS Support Coordination Services	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ccbroward.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Coordinating Council of Broward	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mcccil.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	MCCCIL - Marine Corps Coordinating Council of Illinois	en	government-support-and-welfare	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nwi-ca.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - CoAction	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
community.solutions ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Home - Community Solutions	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
philsysonline.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	PhilSys Online - Philippine National ID Guide	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oasis4refugees.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Home - Oasis International	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cawm.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Home - Community Action Wayne/Medina	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
assitanceforms.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Application \| Assistance Forms	en	government-support-and-welfare Grav	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
howafoundation.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	How Foundation	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tsartlip.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Homepage - Tsartlip First Nation	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
nvguardian.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Nevada Guardianship Association	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nwru.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	National Welfare Rights Union	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oasischpet.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	oasis women welfare organization	en	government-support-and-welfare	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
7starcanada.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	7starimmigration	en	government-support-and-welfare WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.