similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to kattraxler.cloud

Kattraxler alternatives & similar sites

No-Slop Research & Human Thoughts on Security — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
0xteles.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Teles’s Blog \| Security Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
voidvuln.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	VoidVuln \| Security Research & Advisory	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
voip-security.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Next Level VoIP Security Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsha.io ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	0xSHA · Security Research & Engineering	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hexsec.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Hexagon Security \| Occasional Security Thoughts	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xweiss.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	0xWeiss - Security Researcher & Auditor	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xpolar.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	0xpolar - Cybersecurity Research & Offensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ali-abbasi.info ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	EMSEC - Embedded Systems Security Research Group	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xdelta.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	0xD3lta Research — Offensive & Defensive Security	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xfern.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	0xFern \| Independent Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
krishgera.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Krish Gera - Security Research Blogs	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
3rag.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	CHIRAG_ARTANI // SECURITY_RESEARCHER	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
digsec.org ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Digital Security and Privacy for Human Rights Defenders	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pal0x.dev ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Judel Palaca \| pal0x \| Web Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
0xsr.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Suleman Rehman — Red Team Engineer & Security Researcher	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
comsecuris.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Comsecuris Security Research & Consulting	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
hexplot.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Hexplot – Security Research	en	information-and-network-security WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heyosj.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	heyosj — Security Research · OSJ (@inf0stache)	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.