similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to katiebaron.com

Katiebaron alternatives & similar sites

Katie Baron: Journalist, Author, Editor, Trends Forecaster, Consultant — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Publishing Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
ashleyoerman.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Ashley Oerman Author, Editor, Writer, Editorial Consultant	en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ohioamateurs.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ohio Amateur Journalists Home Page	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
serignb.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Serign-B Consultancy	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
phoebemorganauthor.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Phoebe Morgan – Author and Editor	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karlwarsi.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Karl Warsi – Oxford Publishing Consultant	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curranpress.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Curran Press – a boutique editorial and publishing consulting firm	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
customediting.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Developmental & Manuscript Editing Services for Authors	en	publishing-industry Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
keemiyacreatives.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	With us, give wings to your words! - Literary Consultants - Helping authors polish, publish & promote their works.	en	publishing-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oaspjournal.net ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	OASP Journals	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oaspjournal.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	OASP Journals	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
oaspjournals.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	OASP Journals	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chelojournal.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Chelo Journal	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reachpublish.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ReachPublish — Document Engineering Consultancy	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
academicjournals.ca ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Academic Journals	Canada en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ejport.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Online Journal Management Systems	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
crystalclearcreationsatl.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Crystal Clear Creations Atlanta \| Consultant \| Publisher \| Graphic Designer	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
currentwords.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Book Editing and Publishing Services for Authors \| Current Words Publishing	en	publishing-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iaetsdjaras.org ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	IAETSD JARAS \| Journal for Advanced Research	en	publishing-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.