similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to katebird.ca

Katebird alternatives & similar sites

Kate Bird | Writer – Editor – Researcher — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Books And Literature →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
connormartini.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Connor Martini – Ethnographer, Researcher, Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alisonlynmiller.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Alison Lyn Miller – Writer, Editor	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kritibajaj.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Kriti Bajaj – Story seeker, writer & editor	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	full · 12
alchemyandwriting.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Alchemy + Writing – Book coach, Editor, Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diamondgizellebraxton.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Diamond Braxton – Editor and Writer.	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
conniemillardwriter.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Connie Millard – Writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kristenseikaly.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Kristen Seikaly \| Librarian, Writer, Researcher \| Philadelphia \|	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
landynbowers.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Landyn Bowers – Writer. Reader. Teacher. Traveler	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexandravsmith.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Alex Smith – Writer and Educator	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kristamdoud.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Krista M. Doud – Read. Write. Rinse. Repeat.	en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kriscotter.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kris Cotter Editor and Narrator	en	books-and-literature Wix	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shubhasunder.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Shubha Sunder \| writer	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
danielstahl.co ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Daniel Ståhl – Books, AI and research	Colombia en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
viviennekearns.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Vivienne Kearns – Historical Fiction Writer from Dublin, Ireland	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
larryipalmer.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Larry I. Palmer \| Writer & Speaker	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shoshanova.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Saltanat Shoshanova \| Notion	en	books-and-literature	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
donaldbrooksjones.co ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Author \| Editor \| Book Builder – Donald Brooks Jones	Colombia en	books-and-literature WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
vivawittman.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Viva Wittman – Writing & Editing Portfolio	en	books-and-literature WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.