similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to karrlander.net

Karrlander alternatives & similar sites

Home Page — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Management Consulting Industry →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
sicariusinvest.com ↗	62 match 1 shared topics	Sicarius Invest - Business management consulting	sv	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
focira.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	FOCIRA - För tydlighet och inkludering i förändringsarbete	sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ibidea.com ↗	61 match 1 shared topics	IBIDEA – One thought. Thousands of ideas.	sv	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
traineerna.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Forefront – Delade visioner. Större Ambitioner.	sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
daysbyju.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	DaysbyJu \| Boka en gratis konsultation idag	sv	management-consulting-industry Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mehrcatalyst.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Professional consultancy in alumina precipitation, carriers and catalysts	sv	management-consulting-industry Weebly	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
megaconsulting.nu ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	MEGA Consulting AB	sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
culturics.org ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Culturics AB	sv	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
transnova.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Transnova Communications	sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5senter.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	NANU USA, Inc.	United States~ sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
altahr.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Altahr Consulting AB	sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
foergconsulting.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Maximilian Förg - Consulting	sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ic2vil.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	IC2VIL AB, International Command and Control Visual Interactive Language	sv	management-consulting-industry WordPress	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prexcell.com ↗	60 match 1 shared topics	Hem	sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
iakom.ch ↗	33 match 1 shared topics	IaKom \| Home	Switzerland sv	management-consulting-industry	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brandorientation.com ↗	32 match 1 shared topics	Welcome - Brandorientation	sv	management-consulting-industry WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leadbyprofession.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Ledar- organisationsutveckling \| Lead by Profession	sv	executive-leadership-and-management WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
karlssonskraft.com ↗	31 match 1 shared topics	Karlssons-kraft	sv	executive-leadership-and-management	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.