similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to k15t.com

K15T alternatives & similar sites

Confluence Documentation and Jira Sync Platforms | K15t — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Software And Applications →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
cdn-tinymce.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Documentation \| Docs \| TinyMCE	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
cfdocs.org ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	CFML Documentation	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
apiary.io ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Platform for API Design, Development & Documentation \| Apiary	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
simplify-software.org ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Best Plugins for Jira and Confluence	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
simpleapidoc.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Publish your API Documentation.	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sidehint.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	SideHint - In-app documentation made easy	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
branchdocs.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	BranchDocs \| Create Beautiful Documentation in Seconds	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
n-doc.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	GitHub - n-design/n-doc: An Open Source platform for creating Common Criteria documentation · GitHub	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dd-suite.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	DD-Suite Documentation	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ifm3d.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	O3R documentation	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
translero.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Translero — Translation Management Platform	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
signakit.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	SignaKit — Feature Flags, A/B Testing & Experimentation Platform	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 1
myapo.app ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	NOVENTI API Documentation Overview	en	software-and-applications TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
flowbridge.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Developer-First API Integration Platform	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leapwork.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Leapwork \| The Continuous Validation Platform	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
leapwork.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Leapwork \| The Continuous Validation Platform	en	software-and-applications WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kestra.dev ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Kestra, Open Source Declarative Orchestration Platform	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kestra.tech ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Kestra, Open Source Declarative Orchestration Platform	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.