similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to juliama.de

Juliama alternatives & similar sites

Illustration & Grafikdesign von juliama — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
slomografx.com ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Home – ILLUSTRATION & GRAFIKDESIGN	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janscharlau.de ↗	76 match 1 shared topics	Jan Scharlau, Grafikdesign und Illustration	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kalandes.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Ferrier - Grafik, Illustration & Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
airbrushjanus.de ↗	75 match 1 shared topics	Airbrush & Grafikdesign Janus	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jesuisjulie.de ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Grafikdesign und Illustration in Lübeck – je suis Julie. – graphic & design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
atelier-masala.com ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Atelier Masala - Illustration und Grafikdesign	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
achquatsch.de ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	ACH QUATSCH Grafikdesign	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jigjag.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Tanja Kischel, Grafikdesign und Illustration	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
katharinahaines.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Katharina J. Haines • Grafikdesign & Illustration - ILLUSTRATION	Germany de	design Joomla	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andreassisic.de ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Sisic Graphic - Grafikdesign und Illustration aus einer Hand	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javierdesign.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Design und Illustration - Javier Garcia	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ak-grafikdesign.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	ak GrafikDesign - Start	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johanna-herbst.de ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Grafikdesign und Konzeption von Johanna Herbst	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jcorneille.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Jeannette Corneille \| Illustrationen, Grafik, Design (Köln)	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ammerseearts.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	ammerseearts – Grafik, Design & Illustration	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ivonneschnurre.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Ivonne Schnurre – Design und Illustration – Grafikdesign	Germany de	design Weebly WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
jessicafuellenbach.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Start - mi Design + Illustration Jessica Füllenbach	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aleksandar-gruicic.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Aleksandar Gruicic Design & Illustration	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.