similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to js.org

Js alternatives & similar sites

JS.ORG - the JavaScript organization — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Web Development →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
hexo.io ↗	100 match 826 shared linkers	Hexo	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
typescriptlang.org ↗	73 match 558 shared linkers	TypeScript: JavaScript With Syntax For Types.	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
expressjs.com ↗	72 match 304 shared linkers	Express.js · Node.js web application framework	en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nodejs.org ↗	69 match 566 shared linkers	Node.js — Run JavaScript Everywhere	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
reactjs.org ↗	56 match 330 shared linkers	React	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
graphql.org ↗	54 match 176 shared linkers	GraphQL \| The query language for modern APIs	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mongodb.com ↗	54 match 320 shared linkers	MongoDB: The World’s Leading Modern Data Platform \| MongoDB	en	databases	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sass-lang.com ↗	53 match 214 shared linkers	Sass: Syntactically Awesome Style Sheets	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
react.dev ↗	52 match 354 shared linkers	React	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
git-scm.com ↗	50 match 361 shared linkers	Git	en	software-and-applications	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
tailwindcss.com ↗	48 match 446 shared linkers	Tailwind CSS - Rapidly build modern websites without ever leaving your HTML.	en	web-design-and-html	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
postgresql.org ↗	44 match 326 shared linkers	PostgreSQL: The world's most advanced open source database	en	databases	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nextjs.org ↗	44 match 512 shared linkers	Next.js by Vercel - The React Framework	en	web-development	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
prisma.io ↗	40 match 122 shared linkers	Agent Infrastructure for TypeScript	en	software-and-applications	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
docker.com ↗	39 match 390 shared linkers	Docker: Accelerated Container Application Development	en	software-and-applications WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
shadcn.com ↗	38 match 127 shared linkers	shadcn	en	artificial-intelligence	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
nestjs.com ↗	37 match 101 shared linkers	NestJS - A progressive Node.js framework	en	web-development	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
redis.io ↗	36 match 155 shared linkers	Redis - Real-time data for agents & apps	en	databases Sanity	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.