similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jonnyebinger.de

Jonnyebinger alternatives & similar sites

Jonny's Blog: Chronicles of my Knowledge and Personal Discoveries — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jawadtahir.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dr. Jawad Tahir - Personal Blog	Germany de	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kaienderes.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Kai Enderes – Personal Website	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jknowledge.de ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	jknowledge - Java & Software Architecture Blog	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alex-pieper.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Alexander Pieper: Personal Portfolio Site	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
it-virtuoso.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	IT-Virtuoso Knowledge Base	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kalleott.de ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Kalle Ott	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
d42m.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	d42m \| Knowledge • Information • Data	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ip-talks.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	IP Talks – Your source for knowledge in IP, tech, and innovation	de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
johanan.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	About \| force push	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanito.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Kanito \| Electronics & Prototyping	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aharchitect.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Blog of aharchitect	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahablog.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Blog of aharchitect	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbenda.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	jan's blog	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wapuugotchi.com ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	WapuuGotchi - Your cute, personalized Wapuu assistant for WordPress	de	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aggregata.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Index • Archive of Aggregata	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
affenranch.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Affenranch Blog	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
itgrufti.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	ITGrufti's Blog – Hard und Softwaretipps, technische Basteleien und Projekte, Amateurfunk, Reviews, Anleitungen und mehr	Germany de	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jrehkemper.de ↗	63 match 1 shared topics	Homepage and Wiki of Jannik Rehkemper	Germany de	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.