similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jonathanjeter.org

Jonathanjeter alternatives & similar sites

Jonathan Jeter - Director of Application Development — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
fixedit.ai ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	FixedIT Consulting - Axis ACAP Application Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
le-development.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	LE Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
trutechdev.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	TruTech Development, LLC	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
myappso.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Application and website development –	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fmaheu.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	F. Maheu – Embedded System Development	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
forcem.io ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Forcem - Java Development partner	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
zyantific.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	zyantific \| zyantific team development blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
1kbgz.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	1kbgz - Development Studio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fluxpoint.dev ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Fluxpoint Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
princesdevelopment.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Prince's Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brutempire.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Nathaniel - Issue 01 · Application Engineer	United Kingdom~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
deepbluesky.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Deep Blue Sky, Digital Transformation Strategy & Software Development	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mypractic.com ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	EQUIPMENT TECHNOLOGY DEVELOPMENT	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dave-beaumont.co.uk ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Dave Beaumont - Full Stack Development, Operations & Blockchain Content	United Kingdom en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abdullahkhan007.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Abdullah Khan - Development Manager & Platform Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lddpod.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Learning Driven Development	en	technology-and-computing Gumroad	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dynamicdrive.ca ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Dynamic Drive: Web Development Resources and Tutorials	Canada en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
fleyemaps-dev.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	FleyeMaps Development — Sign In \| FleyeMaps	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.