similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jonashusemann.de

Jonashusemann alternatives & similar sites

Jonas Husemann – Brand Direction — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
jonashoffmann.de ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jonas Hoffmann – Digital Swiss Army Knife	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jeffreyyu.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	JEFFREY – Brand Experience Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
volkerheuer.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Büro Volker Heuer – Art Direction, Design and Branding	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jh-dsgn.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Jan Hagemann Brand Design und Consulting Hamburg	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
andrea-kampmann.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Andrea Kampmann – Kommunikationsdesign	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
advisco.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Volker Mehnert . Diplom-Grafikdesigner . Leipzig . Grafikdesign . Art Direction – Branding . Corporate Design . Kommunikationsdesign	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annaorlova.de ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Anna Orlova – Creative Art Director	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janlucas.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Jan Lucas – Creative Director Freelance	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ankegrohmann.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Anke Grohmann – concept, design und marketing	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anke-grohmann.de ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Anke Grohmann – concept, design und marketing	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
eingebrandt.ch ↗	64 match 2 shared topics	Branding, Design und Kommunikation – eingebrandt GmbH	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
karlanders.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Karl Anders – Contemporary Branding - Karl Anders	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
livin-identities.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Livin Identities GmbH - Brand Identity and Design	de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
diemacherin.ch ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Die Macherin – visuelle Kommunikation	Switzerland de	design Squarespace Magento	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jazzunique.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	aesthetic brand experiences - Jazzunique	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
a2zdesign.de ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	A2Z Design – Logos & more	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
chriscueni.ch ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	GrafikDesignCueni – Das Büro für Grafik, Branding und visuelle Kommunikation in Basel	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
cc-newmedia.com ↗	62 match 2 shared topics	CC \| NEW MEDIA - Branding Agentur	de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.