similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jonashermanns.de

Jonashermanns alternatives & similar sites

Jonas Hermanns – Grafik Designer | freier Medienproduktioner — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
katjabeter.de ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Design - Katja Beter \| Grafikdesign \| Medienproduktion \| Greven	Germany de	design Jimdo	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ivanmolina.de ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	Grafik Designer › Ivan Molina	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jbraun-design.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	JBraun Design – Grafik Design Freelancer München	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
david-roth.ch ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	DaVith Grafik Design Portfolio	Switzerland de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kalenbergs.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Kalenberg – GrafikDesign Kommunikation	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kalenberg-design.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Kalenberg – GrafikDesign Kommunikation	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
itze-design.de ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	Susen Mittlmejer \| Grafik Design Hannover \| itze	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annakiefer.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Art Direction & Grafik Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
juliabaesler.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Julia Bäsler Grafik Design	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kanthakdesign.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	grafik design Peter Kanthak: Startseite	Germany de	design TYPO3	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
annetteschindler.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Annette Schindler \| Grafikdesign + Text \| Freiburg	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
geiervisuell.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Geiervisuell \| Visuelle Kommunikation \| Grafik Design \| Freiburg	de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kenny-huebner.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Kenny Hübner – Grafik-Designer aus Leipzig	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anja-seelig.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Anja Seelig – Grafik . Design . Print . Web	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonasheidenreich.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jonas Heidenreich – Kommunikationsdesigner	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kalandes.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Ferrier - Grafik, Illustration & Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
agentur-farbland.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	agentur:farbland – kommunikationsdesign und medienproduktion	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jonaskeseberg.de ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Jonas Keseberg // Visuelle Kommunikation & Grafik Design	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.