similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to johnfulton.org

Johnfulton alternatives & similar sites

John Fulton - Lecturer & Computing Professional | Franklin University — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Programming Languages →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
tutorialsly.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Programming Tutorials for Beginners and Professionals	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
python-sql-aws.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Python-SQL-AWS \| Professional Tech Community	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
adeelatta.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Adeel Atta — Software Engineer \| University of Sindh	en	programming-languages	robots llmsaihumans	email phone	none
pythonbook.org ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Professional Python Programming	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
quantumplayground.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Quantum Computing Playground	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
anguscomputing.club ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Angus Computing Club	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
aaronried.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Programming Problems and Competitions :: HackerRank	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
101computing.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Welcome - 101 Computing	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
brezeale.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Brezeale University	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
actionjoin.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	ActionJoin - Fostering computational thinking	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jkindrix.dev ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Justin Kindrix - Principal Engineer & Language Designer	United States~ en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
q5mjs.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	q5m.js - Quantum Computing Library	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
gubcpc.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	GUBCPC - GUB Competitive Programming Community	en	programming-languages	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
tutorialsheet.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Computer Science Drive	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
csestack.org ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	CSEstack – Computer Science & Programming Portal	en	programming-languages WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
douglasjreece.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	class(abstract) \| brief discourses on computer programming and technology topics	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thejoyofprogramming.com ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	The Joy of Programming	en	programming-languages Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
javatutorial.net ↗	64 match 1 shared topics	Java Tutorial Network \| Java Tutorials for Beginners and Professionals	en	programming-languages WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.