similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to johnbarton.co

Johnbarton alternatives & similar sites

John Barton - Engineering Lead — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
alejandroelinformatico.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	Alejandro Dev. - Engineering Lead, Fullstack Developer, Speaker	Spain~ en	technology-and-computing Ghost	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dionis.me ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Dionis Lebedev. CTO & Head of Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kriscodeman.com ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Kris Coleman – Software Engineer, Leader, Mentor \| kriscodeman.com	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estebanpayret.com ↗	63 match 2 shared topics	Esteban Payret \| Tech Lead & People Manager	en	technology-and-computing Sanity	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
estebansancho.com ↗	61 match 2 shared topics	Esteban Sancho \| Esteban Sancho	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprietolofkrantz.dev ↗	43 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alberto-prieto-lofkrantz.dev ↗	43 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
albertoprieto.dev ↗	43 match 1 shared topics	Alberto Prieto Löfkrantz - Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jackbishop.co ↗	43 match 1 shared topics	Jack Bishop \| Software Engineering Leader	Colombia en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lambdaground.com ↗	42 match 1 shared topics	Lambda Ground - Engineering & Insight	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
evannicoles.com ↗	42 match 1 shared topics	Evan Nicoles - Engineering & Product Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
betz-engineering.ch ↗	42 match 1 shared topics	Betz Engineering	Switzerland en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heythereitsjoey.com ↗	41 match 1 shared topics	Joey \| Engineering Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
heykll.com ↗	41 match 1 shared topics	Eric Hyde \| Engineering Leader and Software Portfolio	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
overengineering.dev ↗	41 match 1 shared topics	Overengineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
koushikdasika.com ↗	41 match 1 shared topics	Koushik Dasika — Hacker, Builder, Engineering Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
polquintana.com ↗	40 match 1 shared topics	Pol Quintana — Engineering	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
pomodoroturntable.com ↗	40 match 1 shared topics	Engineer Pal - Engineering & Technology Community	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.