similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to johansson.tech

Johansson alternatives & similar sites

Jonas Johansson — Technology Lead & Product Architect — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
markmilhouse.com ↗	71 match 2 shared topics	Mark Milhouse — Technology Leader & Builder	United States~ en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
developersteve.com ↗	70 match 2 shared topics	DeveloperSteve — Technology Leader, Startup CEO & Off-Grid Technologist	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamescoates.me ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	James Coates - Software Engineer & Technology Leader	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
pagosdebogota.com ↗	69 match 2 shared topics	Crystalflownode - Technology Innovation & Digital Research	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
5am.dev ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Sam Ayres · Director of Technology	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
martshaw.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Martin Shaw \| Solutions Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jasonfranklin.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Jason Franklin \| Technology, Leadership, and Human Connection	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
wavetrix.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Wavetrix – Technology Product Design and Development	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
designwithdata.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Design with Data — Technology that works in the real world	en	technology-and-computing Spree Commerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
thevideogrid.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	The VideoGrid Network – Technology and innovation leaders	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
discipletech.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Disciple Technologies	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jamisonmarra.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	About - Jamison Marra \| Technology	en	technology-and-computing WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janickovic.me ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jakub Janičkovič — Enterprise Solutions Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
janickovic.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jakub Janičkovič — Enterprise Solutions Architect	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dreamchiptechnologies.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Dream Chip Technologies	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ahskeed.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Ahskeed Technologies	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
sci-worx.com ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Dream Chip Technologies	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dimatteowinery.net ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Pioneering Technology and Innovation	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.