similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jlinc.org

Jlinc alternatives & similar sites

JLINC Protocol — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Information And Network Security →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
aitism.fun ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Null Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ariaprotocol.xyz ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Aria Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
layerprotocol.africa ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Layer Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
webbrogpt.online ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Aegis Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
curvyprotocol.app ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Curvy Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
curvyprotocol.org ↗	74 match 1 shared topics	Curvy Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mirlith.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Mirlith Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
soulwall.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	SoulWall Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
baseline-protocol.org ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Baseline Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
0xpass.io ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	Passport Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
regvaultprotocol.com ↗	72 match 1 shared topics	RegVault Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
a3aprotocol.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	A3A Protocol - Fiducia	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decimag.com ↗	70 match 1 shared topics	DECIMAG \| RTA Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
lp24.tech ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	LP24 — Protocol Portal	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
web3fchainledger.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	WEB3 FCHAIN \| Cyber Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8
sphira.dev ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	SPHIRA - Action Authority Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mwrasp.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	MWRASP \| PHANTOM Protocol Research	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
doauth.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	dOAuth - Decentralized OAuth Protocol	en	information-and-network-security	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.