similar sites

Browse

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Sites similar to jjck.de

Jjck alternatives & similar sites

◢◤ JJCK Schildwächter Grafikdesign Düsseldorf Germany — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
atna-design.com ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	atna-grafikdesign	de	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kerstin-just.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Kerstin Just Grafikdesign	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jb-designstories.de ↗	68 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesign - JB Design Stories	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jpgd.de ↗	67 match 2 shared topics	Jakob Piest, Grafikdesigner aus Braunschweig	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
itshowtime.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	annemation® DESIGN STUDIO \| Illustration Grafikdesign Webproduktion Animation	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
adopedesign.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesign aus Hamburg • A dope Design by Nora	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
afinkdesign.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	afinkdesign - Grafikdesign, Webdesign \| Raum Ulm, Neu-Ulm, Illertissen	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
junoxx-design.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Junoxx-Grafikdesign	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
1mal-anders.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesign – 1MAL anders	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alex-goepel.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Alexander Göpel \| Freelancer Grafikdesigner	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
julodesign.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Büro für Kommunikationsdesign, Grafik Design, Grafikdesign in Konstanz	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
katrin-denker.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesign Katrin Denker – Hamburg – Logodesign – Print – Webdesign	Germany de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	email phone	none
alexvoelk.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Grafik-Design Alex Völk \| in Arbeit	Germany de	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
junkvonmax.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Grafikdesign Passau \| junkvonmax – Logos, Branding, Websites	Germany de	design WordPress Lightspeed	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
steiner-grafik.ch ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Steiner Grafik	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
steinergrafik.ch ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	Steiner Grafik	Switzerland de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
jessicahinz.de ↗	66 match 2 shared topics	zwanzigsechs – Brand Design & Web Design Studio Düsseldorf	Germany de	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
manuelort.ch ↗	65 match 2 shared topics	Manuel Ort – Grafikatelier für Logo, Grafikdesign & Webdesign in Bern	Switzerland de	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.