similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jiddo.net

Jiddo alternatives & similar sites

John David (Jiddo) | Jiddo.net — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Technology And Computing →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
abundantsalmon.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	David Hang	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dbenedict.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	David Benedict - Personal Site	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
benda.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Guy Ben David	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
besidescode.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	Besides Code \| David Weiss \| Substack	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dblooman.com ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	David Blooman	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dnorth.net ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	David North \| The personal blog of David North, software engineer, manager, walker, reader and occasional ranter.	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dearden.dev ↗	66 match 1 shared topics	David Dearden	en	technology-and-computing WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
2ad.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	John A Cairns	en	technology-and-computing	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
david.coffee ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	David Mohl	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dchaley.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	David Haley	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
staveley.org ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	John Staveley - Software Engineer in Leeds, UK	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
abahgat.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Alessandro Bahgat	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
alexeipetrov.space ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Alexei Petrov - Solution Architect & Software Engineer \| Alexei Petrov	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
ankitjain.blog ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Ankit Jain's Blog	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
denisyurchak.com ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Denis Yurchak - Engineer&Founder	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dustinthinks.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Dustin Johnson - Engineer & Creative	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
emallson.net ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	J David Smith \| emallson.net	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
mayank.foo ↗	65 match 1 shared topics	Mayank Chauhan - Software Engineer	en	technology-and-computing	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	partial · 8

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.