similar sites

Browse

Pricing AI Report

Tools

🚀Submit Your Site to AIPush your URL to AI search engines 🛰️AI Bot ObservatoryEvery AI crawler & who blocks it 📇AI Crawler Database900+ AI user agents + robots.txt gen ⚖️AI Crawler ComparisonCompare two AI crawlers head-to-head 💰AI Licensing / Pay-Per-CrawlWho can charge AI crawlers — Pay-Per-Crawl 🎛️AI Robots.txt Policy BuilderGoal-based robots.txt (cite me, don't train)🤖AI Crawler CheckerSee which AI bots your site blocks 🎯AI Readiness CheckerScore your site 0–100 for AI 🔎Similar Site SearchFind websites like any domain 🔗Backlink CheckerWho links to any site — free All tools →

Browse free →

Sites similar to jesseorndorff.com

Jesseorndorff alternatives & similar sites

Jesse Orndorff — Human-Centered Design for Social Impact — 18 websites ranked by shared content topics, category and on-page relevance.

Each result shows its full tech stack, contacts and AI-policy — not just a name · Browse all sites in Design →

Domain	Match	Title	Country/Lang	Category	AI files	Contact	AI-protection
designforsocialimpact.io ↗	77 match 1 shared topics	Design for Social Impact	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
giorgiogaudio.com ↗	73 match 1 shared topics	Giorgio Gaudio — Social Impact Designer	Switzerland~ en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designkindness.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Center for Design Kindness – Amplifying Sustainable Social Impact	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
kellygoto.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Kelly Goto \| Human Centered Design Catalyst & Author	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
socialdesignarchive.org ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	social design archive – connecting people and projects for social impact	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designforsocialinnovation.com ↗	71 match 1 shared topics	Design for Social Innovation	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
decentdesign.org ↗	69 match 1 shared topics	decent design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designforsharing.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Design for Sharing	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
davidvale.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	David Vale — Digital & Spatial Design	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design4development.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	d4d lab Design for Development: a social design initiative	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
dollydaou.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	dr Dolly Daou – Design strategy for impact	en	design WordPress	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
de-front.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	DEFRONT \| Design for future experience	en	design Wix	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
socialjusticedesigncourse.org ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Social Justice Design Course	en	design WordPress WooCommerce	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
davidjrodriguez.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Art Design Culture \| David J Rodriguez	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designsnitch.com ↗	68 match 1 shared topics	Curated design for the individual \| Designsnitch	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designdex.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	DesignDex — Design Research Bank for Design Technology	en	design	robots llmsaihumans	emailphone	none
design-post.com ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	Social Post Design Awards	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none
designsociety.org ↗	67 match 1 shared topics	The Design Society - a worldwide community	en	design	robotsllmsaihumans	emailphone	none

How the match score works

Each match is a 0–100 similarity score — the higher it is, the more two sites resemble one another. It’s computed automatically from our own crawl data (never from what a site says about itself) by combining several independent signals, so a high score means several of them point the same way:

shared topics how many of the same fine‑grained content topics (IAB sub‑categories) both sites cover — the main signal.
same category whether they sit in the same business / industry category.
content & title how closely their titles and page descriptions line up in wording and meaning.

No single signal decides the result — they’re blended together. Treat the score as a way to rank candidates rather than an absolute percentage; the chips on each result show which signals contributed.